Lines 32, 34 and 35 are negative because they had been incorrectly accounted for in the field by Bauer Mechanics. This revision was done by Verena and Armando (Nuna Project Coordinator). Yes, they would have been used on a different trench. It is very difficult, if not impossible, to determine which trench they would have been used in. The only reason this was discovered is because Verena did a count on the teeth inventory. We are only as accurate as the information provided to us by the field. We only do full inventory audits at the end of the season an misolaniouslyand miscellaneously when necessary.

The intent of Lines 58 and 59 was to move the consumed teeth from Hole 6 kimberlite to hole 6 overburden. Unfortunately, after further review, these teeth were not used in kimberlite at all. The negative lines should not have not been included on this sheet. My apologies, this iswas an error on our end and will be rectified immediately.

Please see attached revisions.

Kind Regardsregards,