1) WritersThe writer's position includes the defendsa defense of freedom of speech. And, and at the same time, the writer feels define thedefines real hate crime, and not to confuse it with freedom of speech.

2) The writer givesprovides an example of the ordinance of St. Paul, Minn., about hate crime-laws and how they can go wrong. Because ofdue to misinterpretation.

a) The writer doesn’t believe every speech is a hate-crime and clearly express that;expresses this. Neither is every speech under freedom pfof speech is a hate-crime nor all hate-crimes are freedom of speech and this is the reason whichthat the writer gives.

b) The writer usescites the inefficacy of the definition of hate-crime byin the St. Paul, ordinance. And, and supports his/her ideaideas by givingproviding an example of a case whichthat can be confused by the court because of the insufficient definition.